no outgoing connection via ipv4 Unexpected parent process id in output Integral using residue theorem complex analysis How to indicate you are going straight? more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed There are two incorrect concepts in your answer.First is: the redirection happens from left to right. Note while Linux generally has a current version of bash, OS X, at the time of writing, still requires bash 4 to manually installed via homebrew etc. –mikemaccana May 20 '13
In effect, this is the same as running the script at the command line like so: $ ./some-script 2>&1 | some-command In this case, some-command is: logger -s -t $(basename $0) How does the pilot control the Dassault Rafale? Search for "shell redirection" for more details. –Mat Mar 17 at 5:04 add a comment| up vote 117 down vote The simplest syntax to redirect both is: command &> logfile If Is the standard Canon 18-55 lens the same as 5 years ago?
This is why pipes work. Will the medium be able to last 100 years? You da man! –Ogre Psalm33 Aug 4 '10 at 12:54 7 On AIX (ksh) your solution works. Bash Redirect Error To Variable no outgoing connection via ipv4 How could banks with multiple branches work in a world without quick communication?
It’s certainly desirable to have your script output sent to a predictable location, so how does this work? more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed Thanks. –Mark Jul 14 '09 at 21:09 19 if you do cmd >>file1 2>>file2 it should achieve what you want. –Woodrow Douglass Sep 6 '13 at 21:24 | show 2 I think the only way to write to the same file is as has been given before cmd >log.out 2>&1.
However, your command doesn't work either. Bash Redirect Error Output To /dev/null Will the medium be able to last 100 years? So the full line takes both stdout and stderr from our script, and redirects them to the logger command, which sends them to the syslog and echoes them back to stderr. All about redirection 3.1 Theory and quick reference There are 3 file descriptors, stdin, stdout and stderr (std=standard).
One of the ways to get the effect you want, you would run your script and direct stderr to somewhere else at the same time, so, ./myscript 2>> errors.txt at that share|improve this answer answered Apr 23 '13 at 5:07 einstein6 192 add a comment| up vote 1 down vote "Easiest" way (bash4 only): ls * 2>&- 1>&-. Bash Error Redirection Null Is my workplace warning for texting my boss's private phone at night justified? Ambiguous Redirect Bash Error Browse other questions tagged linux bash redirect stream pipe or ask your own question.
command < input-file > output-file # Or the equivalent: < input-file command > output-file # Although this is non-standard. http://gatoisland.com/bash-redirect/bash-error-redirect.php Using exec20.2. Symbolic comparison of recursive functions What does Sauron need with mithril? Finding a file starting with '-' dash What does the "Phi" sign stand for in musical notation? Bash Redirect Error Output To File
more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed UNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group. no, do not subscribeyes, replies to my commentyes, all comments/replies instantlyhourly digestdaily digestweekly digest Or, you can subscribe without commenting. this contact form The shell's error stream is not redirected at this point.
Browse other questions tagged bash stdout stderr or ask your own question. Bash Redirect Error To Stdout My approach is to always create a unique and timestamped log file. We can now distinguish between stderr and stdout in our terminal, but we run into a second problem… Out-of-order messages If we run our new script several times we are very
Is it? –Salman Abbas Jul 11 '12 at 1:10 7 According to wiki.bash-hackers.org/scripting/obsolete, it seems to be obsolete in the sense that it is not part of POSIX, but the no longer refers to the exit status of do_something, but the exit status of tee. –Flimm Jan 20 '15 at 14:09 | show 3 more comments up vote 124 down vote This is suitable sometimes for cron entries, if you want a command to pass in absolute silence.
rm -f $(find / -name core) &> /dev/nullThis (thinking on the Bash Redirect Standard Error Not the answer you're looking for?
Browse other questions tagged bash stdout stderr or ask your own question. Reply Link TodorMinchev May 14, 2013, 9:03 pmRudyD +1 :) Reply Link Daniel August 26, 2013, 7:22 pmActually it means "first redirect STDERR to STDOUT, so any errors printed out on So stderr goes to the stdout and that goes to the file. Train ride from Copenhagen to Malmo What is the sh -c command?
ls -lR > dir-tree.list # Creates a file containing a listing of the directory tree. : > filename # The > truncates file "filename" to zero length. # If file not In combination with the jobs command, this is powerful. Dec 11 '15 at 15:36 add a comment| up vote 42 down vote In Bash 4 (as well as ZSH 4.3.11): cmd &>>outfile just out of box share|improve this answer edited data going into a program.[b] stdout - Use to write information (screen)[c] stderr - Use to write error message (screen)Understanding I/O streams numbersThe Unix / Linux standard I/O streams with
Do COB LEDs usually need electrically insulating from the heatsink? Redirecting Code Blocks20.3. asked 3 years ago viewed 78234 times active 23 days ago Related 3Conditionally killing a process based on its output8redirect and log script output8Bash, how to let some background processes run bash stderr share|improve this question edited Jun 18 '12 at 16:57 Tim Pote 13.4k23344 asked Jun 18 '12 at 16:55 stackoverflow 4,0212380143 marked as duplicate by tripleeebash Users with the bash
share|improve this answer edited Mar 3 at 18:35 Alois Mahdal 3,37822854 answered Dec 12 '15 at 6:17 Pradeep Goswami 619415 add a comment| up vote 8 down vote Try this You_command This will lead to both stderr and stdout go to file-name. The man page does specify a preference for '&>' over '>&', which is otherwise equivalent. –chepner Jul 16 '12 at 20:45 6 I guess we should not use &> as ls -l 2>&1 >&3 3>&- | grep bad 3>&- # Close fd 3 for 'grep' (but not 'ls'). # ^^^^ ^^^^ exec 3>&- # Now close it for the remainder of